Bookmark
 
 
 
 
Sports Terminal
 

A Good Day to Die Hard  (2013; Rated Rated R)

A Good Day to Die Hard
D+
 

“What a disappointment.”

-Richard Roeper

A Good Day to Die Hard  Review

A Good Day to Die Hard

(2013; R)

In theaters:
Thursday, 14 February 2013

Genre:
Action, Crime, Thriller

Director:
John Moore

Cast:
Bruce Willis, Jai Courtney, Mary Elizabeth Winstead

COMMENTS(11)
 
Post a Comment
 

Steven said on Wednesday, July 10, 2013 10:24:18 PM
So it's worse than the worst action movie/ worst sequel ever made? I'm referring to Live Free or Die Hard.

victor b hall said on Tuesday, June 25, 2013 7:22:59 PM
pretty good

Gordon Raisley said on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:01:04 PM
While this entry doesn't look or sound like any other Die Hard film, it's entertaining in its own right.

Mike said on Friday, March 29, 2013 10:03:08 PM
supposed to be in Russia, but did you see one Lada or Moscovich?

Steven Freekin said on Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:41:05 AM
I was actually looking forward to this movie since the last one was surprisingly good. However, this new installment was utterly stupid, mindless, predictable, and a good day to forget this movie was ever made. Wow, can the writing be any worse, can the cinematography be any amateurish and embarrassing, can acting be any corny and cartoonish, and can the directing be any sophomoric and incompetent? The answer is F en YES! I give it an F-.

Eric Hutchison said on Friday, February 22, 2013 9:23:51 PM
Jenny Sloan, no offense meant to you at all, but the "Die Hard" franchise wasn't always JUST silly and campy. The original 1988 movie in particular did a great job of connecting the audience emotionally to the McClane character and his plight. He wasn't a "superhero" type of action hero. He was a real person, with real-life problems, and you truly were given the sense that he was in grave danger the entire movie. You really felt like he may not make it out of there alive.

The second movie was more like the new one, detached from what made the first movie so good. When the original director John McTiernan came back for the third movie, the quality picked up again. The fourth one we all know about, with its PG-13 softness and such, and the current one is just in a league of its own in terms of disaster.

I'll give it to you that no "Die Hard" movie would be considered as "art," but in the action/thriller genre the first movie is one of the best ever made. Everything since then has been a mixed bag.

Jonathan Reynolds said on Friday, February 22, 2013 7:22:47 AM
You're pretty generous with the D+. A Good Day to Die Hard is sadly one of the worst movies in memory. The only fun to be had was in mocking it.

John Doe said on Thursday, February 21, 2013 5:18:49 PM
Wow! What a surprise! Yet another shitty Die Hard sequel. And released in mid February no less.

Rich said on Thursday, February 21, 2013 10:54:33 AM
Incredibly disappointing. Bruce should be embarassed to have been involved in this.
Absolutely no story

Louie said on Wednesday, February 20, 2013 1:18:19 PM
You are right.This was as fun as a chainsaw colonoscopy.

 
Comments: 1 - 10 of 11

1 2 |
   Page: 1 of 2
 
POST A COMMENT
 
 
  indicates required field
Name:  
Email:  
Website:  
YouTube
Response URL:
   ?
     
Comment:  
     
Enter text as shown:  
     


NOTE: Your comment will be approved before it is posted.
 
 
 
WeatherTech
 
Related Links
Chicago Sun-Times   |   Rotten Tomatoes   |   Hulu   |   Hollywood.com   |   IMDB.com   |   Filmmaking.net   |   TV.com   |   Filmspotting   |   perezhilton   |   ReelzChannel
©2014 Richard Roeper. All Right Reserved | Web site design and development by Americaneagle.com
Questions and Comments   |   Site Map   |   Privacy Policy   |   Terms of Use   |   RSS