Hit and Run (2012; Rated )

xmarisolx said on Friday, May 16, 2014 4:00:47 PM
Complete overreation, and Roger Ebert gave it 3 out of 4 stars, if hat means anything. The story was tight with no loose ends, each character served a purpose, I found Charlie very likebale, and the humor was actually very subtle. Not many one-liners or "jokes," just moments when you laugh at the situations, or sight gags, or the misunderstandings. Like when Charlie says he never told Annie he couldn't contact his family while under protection. Not a joke, but so funny.

I liked it. Not an Oscar contender, but totally unworthy of this dismal review.

jared said on Sunday, May 19, 2013 12:39:34 AM
just netflixed it.....I believe Roeper was right...if you liked it you must be a Dax fan..I don't have anything against him, this was simply not a good movie. We get it you and Bell are a couple...I didn't want to be the 3rd wheel on your road trip

Vera Waitress said on Sunday, March 17, 2013 12:56:46 AM
It was hilarious.

John said on Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:35:23 PM
Luke, I totally agree with what you said.

It was a funny movie with some excellent dialogue.

Critics who default to extremes are lazy.

Brandon, why be a hater. It's unbecoming.

Brandon said on Tuesday, December 25, 2012 5:05:57 PM
Luke- You're on a site full of movie reviews by a critic, buddy. Every point you made is laughable considering that.

Luke said on Monday, September 10, 2012 3:39:51 PM
"The worst"? Really? Why can't people just enjoy movies anymore? If it's not spectacular, it completely sucks, like saying there's no middle ground. My wife & I happened to really like it, we laughed a lot more than we both expected, and we really enjoyed the chase scenes, as well. We've found that if most critics don't like it, we still enjoy it, and some where critics raved about it, we cannot stand it. Why? Because tastes are different, why listen to the rants from someone you've never met, or have absolutely nothing in common with, and find out for yourself. I personally cannot stand the new Fiat, but I don't write reviews about them calling them 'the worst' because I know it's tailored to an audience I'm not a member of.

And Sara, how can you call something a piece of crap without seeing it? You have zero grounds for judgement.

Ned said on Tuesday, September 04, 2012 10:13:54 AM
Sara - I would agree with you on Tom Arnold, but I was surprised at how funny he was in this. It is no groundbreaker, but it funnier than anything I've seen Will Ferrell do. Like, ever.

Skyler said on Thursday, August 30, 2012 6:06:24 PM
It's times like this where I wish he and Roger Ebert still were still comparing notes in some fashion. I'd love to see Richard's reply to Roger's three and a half star review.

Steve said on Saturday, August 25, 2012 1:00:31 AM
I knew it was a bad sign when the poster wrote "The funniest movie of the year" on the poster and they didn't even give a name of a critic.

Sara said on Friday, August 24, 2012 9:30:34 AM
Why don't you tell us how you really feel about this movie? I actively avoid anything with either Dax Shepard or Tom Arnold like the plague, so there is no way in Hell that I'll ever sit through this piece of crap