Grisly, intriguing "What if?" story.
Friday, 27 April 2012
John Cusack, Alice Eve, Luke Evans
Parthenia said on Wednesday, January 14, 2015 12:23:30 AM
Undeniably believe that which you said. Your favorite reason seemed to be at the net the easiest factor to take note of.
I say to you, I definitely get irked at the same time as other
folks think about issues that they just
don't know about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest as neatly as
outlined out the whole thing without having side-effects , folks can take a signal.
Will probably be back to get more. Thanks
Caren said on Monday, January 12, 2015 1:41:06 PM
Really no matter if someone doesn't understand afterward its up to other people that they will help, so here it takes place.
Michael said on Monday, December 03, 2012 12:36:46 AM
Sean, could just be he had a different opinion of the movie than you did. Simple as that. Just because you didn't like it doesn't make it a bad movie.
Ulisses said on Thursday, June 07, 2012 11:47:52 AM
I give Jonah Hill credit for gorniwg up well into this role,? but it was not Oscar-worthy. Roeper called out my fav supporting role of 2011 with Albert Brooks in DRIVE. As far as Best Picture noms, I gave up on this category when AVATAR lost to HURT LOCKER.
Sean said on Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:12:42 PM
Richard, I would like to start off by saying that 9 times out of 10, I tend to agree with your film reviews. Sadly, I have to to say here that this is that one time out of ten! No offense, Rich, but did you smoke a tremendous amount of crack cocaine before you viewed this over-wrought, cliche-ridden, BORING, piece of crap?! I mean, honestly, you didn't even bother to mention the downright AWFUL acting of actress Alice Eve, who's performance was so self-consciously terrible that it doesn't even count as being "campy." Now, normally, if I disagree with a critic's review of a film, regardless of whether I loved it and they hated it, or vice-versa (as in this case), I would notfeel compelled to write a comment. This B+ rating, however, is so incredibly BAFFALING to me, that something MUST be said, lest naive moviegoers see your review and make the same mistake I did spending any money on this garbage.
Regarding why the film, for lack of a better or more perfect word, SUCKS, aside from the horrendous performance of ALL the actors (yes, including Cusack who I usually enjoy, and ESPECIALLY Alice Eve), first of all I felt like the director (who I refuse to call "filmmaker," as that implies an actual artist as opposed to a perfunctory studio appointed hack), tried desperately to rip off the movie "From Hell" in terms of gothic 19th century ambiance. What resulted was a hackneyed attempt filled to the brim with cliches. Aside from the highly implausible plot, which was so uninteresting that I literally couldn't care less who the killer was, the move was just plain BORING! Come to think of it, I may not even be entirely qualified to write this scathing review, SINCE I FELL ASLEEP FOR ABOUT 15 TO 20 MINUTES!! Now, mind you, I haven't fell asleep in a movie theater since I was five years old. I'm 25 now and I have seen some real snoozers, so what does THAT tell you?! Anyway, I really could go on and on, but I doubt you (Richard, whom I still have "mad respect" for despite your misguided review) will even be the one reading this, so I will stop ranting and say...SERIOUSLY?!!??!! A B+???????!!!! WTF?!?!?!